Arena Imbalances & Kalgan

[Meru]

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=2766101029&sid=1

[spudacter]

Well if they refuse to balance the game at 1v1, then they sure as shit cant balance 2v2. Thats why it is worth less points than the others.

Warlock nerfs in 2.3 are warrior buffs, Kalagan does not want any competition for his warrior in 2v2.

[Marema]

Balance is impossible. There is no such thing as balance. Please 1 group and the others are unhappy. Make the unhappy groups happy and you displease the previously happy group. If you want balance, remove all but 1 class and even then there will be people that complain about it.

Im horrible at pvp so therefore I feel like I need to be buffed to compete against better pvpers. It is a constant struggle for designers to attempt to please everybody and it will never, ever, ever, ever happen, in this game or any other.

I never understood why people always complain about imbalance. Its the way it goes and will always go, the sooner people realize this the less frustrated they will be.

[Nightlive]

Hes a fucking idiot.

[Sly]

of course 2v2 is imbalanced.... anyone with half a brain knows that

[Marema]

hey Sly where did you get the signature. I like that one.

[Yooxra]

http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=2766101029&sid=1

Yes it's ok for some classes to have big advantages in small environment pvp. Also it's ok to make healing classes have drink advantages to make matchs longer at the expensive of making other classes weaker. Grats druids on arena domination.